Historical documentaries including “The
Prequel” contains an academic tone, one that makes the readers feel the
intensity as well as being able to believe that the mentioned historical facts
and analysis are credible and worth believing. “As a resident of Asia for most
of the past thirteen years, I’ve been searching for an explanation. It has
always seemed to me that the turning point came in the early 1400s, when
Admiral Zheng He sailed from China to conquer the world.” Here, the author
provided a slight of his background information in order to enhance
credibility. He stated that he was a resident of Asia, intending for the
readers to assume that he is an expert in Zheng He and Asia-related History. Even
with such an exaggerated statement like “Admiral Zheng He sailed from China to
conquer the world”, this statement is deemed credible because the author subtly
mentioned that he is an expert in this field. Just like the historical video
documentaries, each guest speakers are subject to a line or two of texts that
introduces the speaker’s background; for example “Professor Jackson Warkentin
from University of California, Santa Barbara, specializes in East Asian
studies.” With this, even before the professor started talking, viewers already
unconsciously realized that this speaker is more knowledgeable than they are,
and whatever they say will be credible.
Many people will find history mundane, and therefore each historical-related texts will include some unique
elements that aims to hook the reader’s attention. For example, in “The
Prequel” Kristof mentioned the phenomenon of giraffes according to the Chinese
people in the 1400s. “Every time I heard the story about the giraffes my pulse
began to race. Chinese records indicate that Zheng He had brought the first
giraffes to China… The giraffe caused an enormous stir in China because it was
believed to be the mythical qilin, or Chinese unicorn.” The author immediately
hooked his readers by mentioning how his pulse began to race whenever he hears
about the story that he’s about to tell. After successfully grasping the
reader’s attention, the author then cleverly threw in an interesting fact that
Zheng He had brought the first giraffes to China, and at the same time
presenting the fact in a way that it is credible. The author then inserted
mythology within the text as a wow factor – at this point all the readers are
amazed by this new unknown fact. After reading about giraffes, the readers
might wonder where did Zheng He receive the giraffes? Throwing in fun facts
like these could not only entertain the readers, but also allowed them to
analyze deeper asking themselves how? Why? And so what? (which are all
important questions in history.
Towards the end of the text, the author
invites his audiences on a journey filled with “what ifs?” In doing so, the
readers will think about this texts beyond what they read, a technique that
proves to be thought provoking, and very influential. “If ancient China had
been greedier and more outward-looking, if other traders had followed in Zheng
He’s wake and then continued on, Asia might well have dominated Africa and even
Europe.” This is one of the moments where history could have went in many other
directions, which will of course have an impact on the present. Rhetorical
techniques like these not only make the readers believe what they read, but
also convince them that history as a whole offers much more than what people
usually think.
I think you did well at analyzing specific parts of the text. I might also consider what rhetorical strategies the text used as a whole. I did find that the quotes provided nice examples for what you were referring to when analyzing the text. The text was well situated overall; everything made sense. I would also consider focusing more on why these strategies are unique to this genre, and why and how the author conveyed these techniques.
ReplyDelete